State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace政府***与国内***和平 pdf 免费 地址 txt lrf 下载 kindle umd

　　Does democracy reduce state repression as human rights activism, funding, and policy suggest? What are the limitati*** of this argument? Investigating 137 countries from 1976 to 1996, State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace seeks to shed light on these questi***. Specifically, it finds that electoral participation and competition generally reduces personal integrity violati*** like torture and mass killing; other ***ects of democracy do not wield c***istent influences. This negative influence can be overwhelmed by conflict, however, and thus there are important qualificati*** for the peace proposition.

Figures

Tables

Preface

INTRODUCTION

1 REPRESSION AND THE SEARCH FOR PEACE

2 DISAGGREGATION AND CONTEXTUALIZATION

3 DATA AND METHODOLOGY

4 DEMOCRATIC PACIFICATION: THE DIRECT EFFECTS OF VOICE AND VETO

5 PEACE UNDER FIRE: THE INTERACTIVE EFFECT OF DEMOCRACY AND CONFLICT

6 (RE)CONSIDERING DOMESTIC PEACE

Appendix I

Appendix II

Bibliography

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace政府***与国内***和平在线阅读

在线听书地址：State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace政府***与国内***和平在线收听

在线购买地址：State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace政府***与国内***和平在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

　　"State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace is that rare book that compels the reader to adopt a significantly transformed way to think about democracy's warts as well as its many virtues. Christian Davenport has done a masterful job of exploring and explaining the conditi*** unde***hich democratic governments resort to repressive and coercive policies. He has done so in a rigorous setting that contrasts the incentives of democratic and non-democratic leaders and that presents a wholly original and persuasive view that not only shows why democrats are less likely to repress than are other types of leaders, but also explains why, when and how democrats do repress their own citizens. Davenport's book is a tour d' force, a must read for anyone who wants to understand the underside of democracy."

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　——Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, New York University

　　"This is a carefully nuanced comparative examination of how democratic instituti*** do and don't effectively c***train state repression under conditi*** of domestic and international threat. It is relevant to both new and long-established democracies."

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　——Bruce Russett, Yale University

　　"While the interstate democratic peace finding is well known and has stood up to the most rigorous empirical scrutiny, the spread of institutional democracy and its effects on state repression have been largely ignored. Many otherwise attentive observers have assumed that democratic instituti*** provide a robust firebreak on government sp***ored violence against dissenting citizens. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace shows us the glass is but half full. Drawing on, synthesizing, and extending insights from comparative politics and international relati***, political instituti***, and conflict studies, Davenport provides one of the most important studies of state repression yet written. A must read for those interested in political repression, state sp***ored violence, and the future of liberalism."

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　——Allan C. Stam, Dartmouth College

　　"Davenport's State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace is a masterful, systematic and sobering ***ysis of how contemporary states--often unsuccessfully--must tread a thin line between protecting and repressing political ***s."

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　——Michael D. Ward, University of Washington

　　作者简介：

　　Christian Davenport is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Maryland - College Park as well as Director of the Radical Information Project (RIP). Primary research interests include political conflict (e.g., human rights violati***, genocide/politicide, torture, political surveillance/covert repressive action, civil war and social movements), measurement, and racism. Professor Davenport is the author of numerous articles appearing in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, the Journal of Politics, the Journal of Conflict Resolution, Political Research Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and the Monthly Review (among others). He is the recipient of numerous grants (e.g., 6 from the National Science Foundation) and awards (e.g., the Russell Sage Foundation Visiting Scholar Award and the Residential Fellowship at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences). Professor Davenport recently concluded another study entitled The Rashomon Effect: Contentious Politics, Data Generation and the Importance of Perspective, which will be submitted to the Cambridge University Press series in Contentious Politics. He is also the editor of two books: Repression and Mobilization: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? (University of Minnesota Press, 2004), and Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violati*** and Contentious Politics (Rowman & Littlefield, 2000).

书籍介绍

Does democracy decrease state repression in line with the expectati*** of governments, international ***anizati***, NGOs, social movements, academics and ordinary citizens around the world? Most believe that a 'domestic democratic peace' exists, rivalling that found in the realm of interstate conflict. Investigating 137 countries from 1976 to 1996, this book seeks to shed light on this question. Specifically, three results emerge. First, while different ***ects of democracy decrease repressive behaviour, not all do so to the same degree. Human rights violati*** are especially resp***ive to electoral participation and competition. Second, while different types of repression are reduced, not all are limited at comparable levels. Personal integrity violati*** are decreased more than civil liberties restricti***. Third, the domestic democratic peace is not bulletproof; the negative influence of democracy on repression can be overwhelmed by political conflict. This research alters our conception of repression, its ***ysis and its resolution.